A simple theory: the United States has, at times, had an interest in undermining British political and strategic positions, and stories of this kind can sometimes be amplified or selectively exposed to serve wider geopolitical objectives. But the reality behind the headlines may be considerably more complicated.
At the same time, some Islamist political actors have occasionally pursued strategies that ultimately undermine their own interests—effectively putting the knife to their own heads.
There were also attempts by certain political forces to weaken or bring down the Labour Party in the United Kingdom. If those forces believe they have succeeded, the longer-term consequence may be very different from what they anticipated: the UK establishment and political system will eventually wake up to the broader implications.
And there is another dimension that should not be ignored: elements within the Indian diaspora can sometimes become involved in these geopolitical and political games. Yet such manoeuvring does not necessarily advance India’s interests. Quite the opposite—it can create additional strategic difficulties for Bharat, forcing India to deal with consequences generated by actors who may believe they are acting in its favour.
The irony is that geopolitical games rarely remain under the control of those who initiate them. What appears to be a victory in the short term can become a strategic liability in the long term.
